8/20/2014

Who are they? Yakuzas or Civil Rights Activists?



They claim to have been fighting for elimination of “discrimination” under the name of “Shibaki-tai”, literally meaning “Beat-up Gang” supposed to be a civil rights activist group. By Japan’s credible standard, they will be certainly judged to be a group of Yakuzas, wearing tattoos and threatening good citizens with violent acts and words. They often behave to protect their interests to the extent that they violate laws and actually get arrested for violence used against some of the peaceful Japanese demonstrators, whom UN organ has recently denounced as “hate speech abusers”.
UN seems much prejudiced against them since UN has been influenced by massive flow of information transmitted in English through powerful mass media, based on stories conclusively written in English by Korean reporters in Japan. Their neutrality is dubious in a sense that they have often viewed the Japanese demonstrators protesting against “the privileges granted to the Koreans” only from their perspective and for the benefits of the Korean citizens in Japan.
In other words, they unfairly voice only the Korean opinions and represent Koreans as if to say that there exists discrimination against them, the racial discrimination often seen in the West, whereas the Japanese demonstrators demand the Government of Japan to immediately scrap, for achieving equality for all,  the special privileges that have remained customarily granted to the Korean citizens in Japan since the U.S. occupation of Japan in 1945. This practice, if proven to be true, should be condemned as a hideous means to keep Japanese discriminated against because Japan lost the last war. It shows that UN created by victors of the last war clearly discriminates against Japan and her people, as evidenced in the fact that UN still regards Japan as one of the enemies in so-called UN enemy clauses of article 53 and 107 that have remained symbolically unchanged ever since great power unity was first discussed at the Dumbarton Oaks conference on August 21, 1944.
More significantly, Korea was part of Japan, annexed under the amicably and internationally recognized agreement until two Koreas were created as areas for U.S. and USSR to pursue their hegemonies in the Far East after Korea was divided into two, based on the imprudent decision made by the U.S. military authority for the undisclosed reasons

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please feel free to make your comments on the issues